• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Injured Workers Online

Injured Workers Online

Working Together for Justice

  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • About
  • Twitter
Working Together for Justice
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • History
    • Law Reform
    • Workers’ compensation bills
    • Chronic Pain Victory
    • Research and Education
    • Bancroft Institute
    • Meredith Conference: “No-Half Measures”
    • RAACWI
  • Issues
    • Age 65+ discrimination
    • Appeals
    • Benefits
    • Cost of living adjustments
    • Deeming
    • Pre-existing conditions
    • Experience Rating
    • Funding
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Return to Work
    • Stigma and surveillance
    • Universal Coverage
  • Community
    • Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups (ONIWG)
    • Workers’ Comp Is a Right campaign
    • Injured Worker Groups
    • IW Speakers School
    • Injured Workers’ Stories
    • Arts & social justice
  • Events
    • Calendar View
    • RSI Awareness Day
    • Day of Mourning
    • Injured Workers Day
    • Women of Inspiration Vigil
    • Labour Day – a workers’ festival
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Fact Sheets
    • Headlines on workers’ compensation
    • Videos
  • Resources
    • Law and Policy Submissions
    • Reports, Articles & Papers
    • Practical guides & booklets
    • IWHP Bulletins
    • Library
    • Find Legal Help
    • Links
Home / Finance

Finance

Supplementary submission to the WSIB Funding Review

August 31, 2011

Response to the Marshall submissions, including the Nexus paper and Eckler models on funding levels. Through its emphasis on full pre‐funding of the system and claims cost based rate‐setting, the Marshall scheme threatens to undermine the goals of workers’ compensation as a…

Download Supplementary submission to the WSIB Funding Review Continue reading Supplementary submission to the WSIB Funding Review

Letter re Workers’ compensation platforms

August 31, 2011

Letter (Nov. 2, 2010) to leaders of Ontario’s provincial parties, outlining changes and problems with funding and benefit levels in the workers’ compensation system and requesting publication of their policies; addresses deeming, inflation, Serious Injuries Program. Follow-up letter (Aug. 31, 2011) alerts…

Download Letter re Workers’ compensation platforms Continue reading Letter re Workers’ compensation platforms

Follow-up of the submission to the Funding Review

June 13, 2011

After presenting their stories at the public hearing, the injured workers’ group details its concerns on benefit indexation, coverage and employer incentives.…

Download Follow-up of the submission to the Funding Review Continue reading Follow-up of the submission to the Funding Review

Submissions to the WSIB Funding Review

April 27, 2011

Paper comments on five key issues of the Review. On the appropriate funding level, it notes “the view that the unfunded liability presents a crisis derives from the inappropriate use of private insurance company metrics to the evaluation of the health of…

Download Submissions to the WSIB Funding Review Continue reading Submissions to the WSIB Funding Review

Presentation to the WSIB Funding Review

April 27, 2011

Memo on background material for the Group’s presentation to the Review. The written submissions include selected letters by injured workers on the impact of previous Board measures to address the unfunded liability (Bill 165, Bill 99).…

Download Presentation to the WSIB Funding Review Continue reading Presentation to the WSIB Funding Review

The “Meredith Principles” – economic or humanitarian?

April 18, 2011

Submission to the WSIB Funding Review details for the Chair, with direct reference to Meredith’s Commission hearings and report, the discussion and intent of the adopted recommendations on how the system would be funded.…

Download The “Meredith Principles” – economic or humanitarian? Continue reading The “Meredith Principles” – economic or humanitarian?

Presentation to the WSIB Funding Review

April 13, 2011

Detailed response and recommendations based on injured worker experiences and research; paper calls for the Chair to follow Meredith’s example and create a balanced vision of a workers’ compensation system, to look beyond the North American norm to European systems that have…

Download Presentation to the WSIB Funding Review Continue reading Presentation to the WSIB Funding Review

Submissions to the WSIB Funding Review

April 11, 2011

Compilation of four submissions (April 11, June 15, Aug 31, Nov. 18) to the review led by Harry Arthurs. While applauding the choice, IWC expresses concerns at the process, “brokerage politics”, and a manufactured financial crisis. Papers provide detailed commentary on unfunded…

Download Submissions to the WSIB Funding Review Continue reading Submissions to the WSIB Funding Review

Preliminary submissions on funding to the WSIB Funding Review

April 5, 2011

ONIWG asks why the review is not considering the issue of coverage, given the potential additional revenue from assessments if all workers were covered. The submission points out that if employer assessments had not been decreased, there would be no “financial crisis”;…

Download Preliminary submissions on funding to the WSIB Funding Review Continue reading Preliminary submissions on funding to the WSIB Funding Review

Submission to the Standing Committee regarding Bill 135

December 2, 2010

Submission to the Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs regarding Schedule 21 of the Helping Ontario Families and Managing Responsibly Act which amends the WSIA by: adding a requirement for full funding of the workers’ compensation system, removing the requirement to…

Download Submission to the Standing Committee regarding Bill 135 Continue reading Submission to the Standing Committee regarding Bill 135

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Blog

  • A quick look back at 2021
Copyright © 2026 Injured Workers Online
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

The information in this website is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for legal advice. For legal advice, see Find legal help