• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Injured Workers Online

Injured Workers Online

Working Together for Justice

  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • About
  • Twitter
Working Together for Justice
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • History
    • Law Reform
    • Workers’ compensation bills
    • Chronic Pain Victory
    • Research and Education
    • Bancroft Institute
    • Meredith Conference: “No-Half Measures”
    • RAACWI
  • Issues
    • Appeals
    • Benefits
    • Experience Rating
    • Funding
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Return to Work
    • Stigma and surveillance
    • Universal Coverage
  • Community
    • Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups (ONIWG)
    • Workers’ Comp Is a Right campaign
    • Injured Worker Groups
    • IW Speakers School
    • Injured Workers’ Stories
    • Organizing and Action
    • Arts & social justice
  • Events
    • Calendar View
    • RSI Awareness Day
    • Day of Mourning
    • Justice Bike Ride
    • Injured Workers Day
    • December demo
    • Labour Day – a workers’ festival
  • Media
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • Fact Sheets
    • Headlines on workers’ compensation
    • Videos
  • Resources
    • Law and Policy Submissions
    • Reports, Articles & Papers
    • Practical guides & booklets
    • IWHP Bulletins
    • Library
    • Find Legal Help
    • Links
Home / Issues / Stigma and surveillance

Stigma and surveillance

Although it is their legal right, injured workers still find that filing a claim for the workers’ compensation can expose them to suspicion and scorn. Hostile attitudes and behaviour of those around them – the WSIB , employers, doctors, colleagues, even neighbours – compound the harm caused by their work-related injury.

Stigma happens when injured workers are unfairly judged on presumed moral worthiness and character. Some “blame the victim”, charging them with being careless workers rather than questioning if the employer has provided safe working conditions. Others doubt the legitimacy of their claim and accuse them of “gaming the system” by faking or exaggerating symptoms to avoid work or personal responsibilities, collect “easy money” or some other benefit. Poverty, pain and unemployment rates among injured workers tell the real story.

Dealing with suspicion on top of injury

Kirsh 2009 chart on impacts of stigma on injured workers

Stigmatization happens especially when the injury is an invisible one such as a musculoskeletal disorder bringing chronic pain, or a psychological disability.

In recent years research into injured workers’ interactions with the workers’ compensation system and experiences with return to work has documented a too-frequent discourse of abuse that hurts health and personal wellbeing and delays recovery.

The treatment of injured workers and aggressive claims management can reflect institutional mistrust and cost containment priorities. In the workplace, employers and co-workers may regard injured workers as troublemakers, their need for time to heal or job accommodation resented and distrusted by those who feel burdened with extra work or costs.

In 2008 the Research Action Alliance on the Consequences of Work Injury proposed an anti-stigma initiative to the WSIB. Over the next three years their joint project aimed to identify and research stigmatizing attitudes in the Board, workplace, healthcare system and community at large, and take concrete measures (staff training, communication programs) to improve interactions. While the initiative was a positive step forward, recent policies and practices at the Board have undermined the good intent.

More resources and links
  • Kilgour, Beth et al. 2015. “Interactions Between Injured Workers and Insurers in Workers’ Compensation Systems: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research Literature.” Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 25(1): 160-181.
  • Warsi, Sheena. 2014. “Injured Workers and Stigma: An Interdisciplinary Analysis.” Athabasca: Athabasca University
  • Lippel, Katherine. 2012. “Preserving workers’ dignity in compensation systems: an international perspective”. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 55: 519-536.
  • Kirsh, Bonnie. 2009. “The Nature and Consequences of Stigma as Experienced by Injured Workers.” Presentation at the RAACWI Community Forum, Toronto, April 29.
  • Eakin, Joan M. 2005. “The discourse of abuse in return-to-work: A hidden epidemic of suffering.” In Occupational Health and Safety: International Influences and the New Epidemics, edited by Chris L. Peterson and Claire Mayhew, ch. 9, 159-174. Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing
 

Updated August 10, 2022

Primary Sidebar

In this section

  • Surveillance
Easy Money

The community theatre project “Easy Money”, based on a research study of injured workers’ experiences facing stigma

Recent Updates

  • Injured workers don’t fake pain or poverty
    March 23, 2020
  • IWC supports Toronto’s first International Black Mental Health Day
    March 17, 2020
  • Not alone in his despair
    March 1, 2017

More Related Updates

Footer

Stay connected – get our blog updates
Copyright © 2023 Injured Workers Online
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

The information in this website is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for legal advice. For legal advice, see Find legal help