Injured Workers Online

Working Together for Justice

Working Together for Justice
Home / Issues / Return to Work

Return to Work

Time to heal

The workplace is not a rehabilitation centre. With adequate time for medical recovery and job accommodation, an injured worker should be able to return to work safely and without fear of re-injury. In fact, the WSIB once acknowledged the need to properly balance recovery and safety in their Best Approaches adjudicative guide Recognizing Time to Heal (2005).

This was replaced by Better at Work, based on the belief that “immediate” return to work is always preferable… The Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups, in its July 2016 letter to the Premier on this mistaken and harmful philosophy, calls for policy to be based on the “early and safe” return to work legislation and aligned with the evidence in current research. Better at Work continues to be widely critiqued as ignoring the worker’s individual situation, pressuring injured workers back to work prematurely and pushing hurt workers into ‘humiliating’ jobs and unemployment. The Board’s 2019 Return-to-work policy review and new policies (in effect Nov. 2020) fail to address these core concerns.

National Symposium on Return to Work in a Changing World of Work, Ottawa, May 16-17 2019

The goal of vocational rehabilitation should be decent, safe and sustainable work for the worker who is actually employed as a result – not merely “deemed” to be employed. It must provide financial security for the worker if return to work fails.

Ontario’s vocational rehabilitation program (now “work transition”) has undergone many changes including outsourcing to the private sector its retraining services for those unable to return to their previous employer (Labour Market Re-entry program). Its many problems were made public in the Toronto Star’s 2009 report “A jobs program that fails” and Ontario Ombudsman investigation of private career colleges.

Effective return to work?

The current program of Work Reintegration came into full effect in 2011 following KPMG’s 2009 LMR Value-for-Money Audit recommendations. It merged the Labour Market Re-entry and Early and Safe Return to Work programs, putting all rehabilitation services back under the Board’s direct operation. During the rushed consultations injured workers and their advocates raised concerns about:

  • Lack of time to heal and the risk of re-injury
  • Expansion of deeming
  • Arbitrary and harmful time limits on retraining
  • Cutbacks for older workers

They also called on the Board to take steps to address:

  • the special needs of more vulnerable workers (those injured while working in non-unionized workplaces, often in temporary or precarious jobs)
  • early recognition of toxic work environments
  • continued access to retraining and loss of earnings benefits if employment relationships break down

Why a supportive work environment matters

Goodwill and trust in the workplace by employer and co-workers are key to a successful return to work. Suspicion of the legitimacy of an injury, resentment over job accommodations, myths that workers with disabilities are less productive or will be more costly or affect experience rating – all can add stress and be a barrier to recovery. Returning workers, if feeling pressured to constantly “prove” they are pulling their weight, also run the risk of physical re-injury.

More info

Updated March 27, 2021