• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Injured Workers Online

Injured Workers Online

Working Together for Justice

  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • About
  • Twitter
Working Together for Justice
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • History
    • Law Reform
    • Workers’ compensation bills
    • Chronic Pain Victory
    • Research and Education
    • Bancroft Institute
    • Meredith Conference: “No-Half Measures”
    • RAACWI
  • Issues
    • Age 65+ discrimination
    • Appeals
    • Benefits
    • Cost of living adjustments
    • Deeming
    • Pre-existing conditions
    • Experience Rating
    • Funding
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Return to Work
    • Stigma and surveillance
    • Universal Coverage
  • Community
    • Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups (ONIWG)
    • Workers’ Comp Is a Right campaign
    • Injured Worker Groups
    • IW Speakers School
    • Injured Workers’ Stories
    • Arts & social justice
  • Events
    • Calendar View
    • RSI Awareness Day
    • Day of Mourning
    • Injured Workers Day
    • Women of Inspiration Vigil
    • Labour Day – a workers’ festival
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Fact Sheets
    • Headlines on workers’ compensation
    • Videos
  • Resources
    • Law and Policy Submissions
    • Reports, Articles & Papers
    • Practical guides & booklets
    • IWHP Bulletins
    • Library
    • Find Legal Help
    • Links
Home / Issues / Funding / Funding reviews

Funding reviews

Several major reviews of WSIB finances have been undertaken in the past two decades.

Funding Fairness

The WSIB Funding Review (2010-2011), chaired by Professor Harry Arthurs, followed a series of reports commenting on the Board’s finances, including the the 2009 Auditor General’s report (s.3.14)  and 2010 Chair’s Consultation report (Steve Mahoney).

The Arthurs Review considered unfunded liability, premium rate setting, rate groups, employer incentive programs (experience rating), funding occupational disease claims and indexation of benefits. The injured worker community participated in large numbers, with personal accounts and detailed submissions, and raised related issues that should be considered, particularly universal coverage.

Although his comprehensive report  “Funding Fairness” (May 2012) supported a transition to full funding, Arthurs made other recommendations that would help injured workers if adopted, in particular that:

  • The unfunded liability should not be used to treat injured workers unfairly – that increased claim denials and reduced benefits should not be used to achieve the WSIB’s financial target
  • All injured workers should be fully and automatically protected from inflation and rise in the cost of living
  • If it cannot prevent and punish claims suppression (a ‘moral crisis’), the Board should discontinue its experience rating
  • Injured workers do not have enough resources to speak out
  • The WSIB should deal with the issue of universal coverage

Even before Professor Arthurs issued his report, amendments to the Act (WSIA) and WSIB practices (including major cuts to benefits) were pushed through that were not in line with his recommendations but were in step with the widely critiqued  2010/2011 KPMG Value-for-Money audit.

    Pricing Fairness

    The 2013 Rate Framework Consultation (2013-4), chaired by Douglas Stanley, and its final report “Pricing Fairness” (2014,) also disregarded the Arthurs’ Funding Review recommendations on rate setting and experience rating. Further Rate Framework Modernization consultations (completed 2016) and the Rate Framework Policy Consultation (2017-Jan. 2018) followed, with new policies in effect Jan. 1, 2020.

    More resources and links
    • Ontario Legal Clinics’ Workers’ Compensation Network. 2012 Jan. Submission re KPMG Value-for-Money Audit.
    • Injured Workers’ Consultants. 2011. Submissions to the WSIB Funding Review. Toronto: IWC. Apr. 27, June 15, Aug. 31, Nov. 18.

    Updated May 18, 2025

    Primary Sidebar

    Issues

    • Appeals
    • Age 65+ discrimination
    • Benefits
    • Experience Rating
    • Funding
      • Cost-cutting crisis to “surplus”?
      • Funding reviews
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Return to Work
    • Stigma and surveillance
    • Universal Coverage
    Copyright © 2026 Injured Workers Online
    • Accessibility
    • Terms of Use
    • Privacy

    The information in this website is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for legal advice. For legal advice, see Find legal help