• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Injured Workers Online

Injured Workers Online

Working Together for Justice

  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • About
  • Twitter
Working Together for Justice
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • History
    • Law Reform
    • Workers’ compensation bills
    • Chronic Pain Victory
    • Research and Education
    • Bancroft Institute
    • Meredith Conference: “No-Half Measures”
    • RAACWI
  • Issues
    • Appeals
    • Benefits
    • Experience Rating
    • Funding
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Return to Work
    • Stigma and surveillance
    • Universal Coverage
  • Community
    • Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups (ONIWG)
    • Workers’ Comp Is a Right campaign
    • Injured Worker Groups
    • IW Speakers School
    • Injured Workers’ Stories
    • Organizing and Action
    • Arts & social justice
  • Events
    • Calendar View
    • RSI Awareness Day
    • Day of Mourning
    • Justice Bike Ride
    • Injured Workers Day
    • December demo
    • Labour Day – a workers’ festival
  • Media
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • Fact Sheets
    • Headlines on workers’ compensation
    • Videos
  • Resources
    • Law and Policy Submissions
    • Reports, Articles & Papers
    • Practical guides & booklets
    • IWHP Bulletins
    • Library
    • Find Legal Help
    • Links
Home / Blog / Claims / Top court decision challenges WSIB’s proposed chronic stress policy

Top court decision challenges WSIB’s proposed chronic stress policy

June 29, 2017

On June 2, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada released a unanimous decision on compensation for psychological injuries (Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28). It was a civil lawsuit from B.C. involving a motor vehicle collision.

The trial judge found that the accident caused psychological injuries to the plaintiff. The decision did not rest on an identified medical cause or expert evidence, but was based on the testimony of his friends and family to the effect that his personality had changed for the worse after the accident.

The B.C. Court of Appeal allowed an appeal because the plaintiff did not present expert evidence of a medically recognized psychiatric or psychological injury.

The Supreme Court of Canada disagreed:

A finding of legally compensable mental injury need not rest, in whole or in part, on the claimant proving a recognized psychiatric injury. The law of negligence accords identical treatment to mental and physical injury. Requiring claimants who allege mental injury to prove that their condition meets the threshold of recognizable psychiatric illness, while not imposing a corresponding requirement upon claimants alleging physical injury to show that their condition carries a certain classificatory label, would accord unequal protection to victims of mental injury…

Furthermore, confining compensable mental injury to conditions that are identifiable with reference to psychiatric diagnostic tools is inherently suspect as a matter of legal methodology. While, for treatment purposes, an accurate diagnosis is obviously important, a trier of fact adjudicating a claim of mental injury is not concerned with diagnosis, but with symptoms and their effects …  The trier of fact’s inquiry should be directed to the level of harm that the claimant’s particular symptoms represent, not to whether a label could be attached to them.”

This decision calls into question the legality of the WSIB’s proposed policy on when it will compensate for chronic mental stress disabilities when the law changes in 2018. The proposed policy states:

“Before any traumatic mental stress or chronic mental stress claim can be adjudicated, there must be a diagnosis in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) …” 

The WSIB requires a diagnosis and the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that you cannot require a diagnosis, it is the symptoms and their effects that are important.

This is an important consideration to raise in the ongoing WSIB policy consultation.  The consultation deadline for comments on the WSIB’s proposed policy is July 7th .

Related:

  • Singleton, Antony. 2017 May 10. “The Good, The Bad And The Ugly: The WSIB’s Draft Chronic Mental Stress Policy.” Just Compensation (blog)
  • IWO Fact sheet. 2016 Nov. 15. Workplace Chronic Mental Stress Claims

Filed Under: Claims, Mental Health

Primary Sidebar

Latest Tweets

Injuredworkersonline Follow

IWO_org
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
17 Aug

Eight ways to improve construction health and safety | Canadian Occupational Safety https://www.thesafetymag.com/ca/topics/safety-and-ppe/eight-ways-to-improve-construction-health-and-safety/416991

Reply on Twitter 1559904526446084097 Retweet on Twitter 1559904526446084097 Like on Twitter 1559904526446084097 Twitter 1559904526446084097
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
9 Aug

Province investigating deaths of construction workers after Ajax trench collapse https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2022/08/09/province-investigating-deaths-of-construction-workers-after-ajax-trench-collapse.html via @torontostar

Reply on Twitter 1557111845793800192 Retweet on Twitter 1557111845793800192 Like on Twitter 1557111845793800192 Twitter 1557111845793800192
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
9 Aug

Ontario unions tell Ford to "Listen Up!" as Ontario Legislature resumes - including a call for universal coverage https://financialpost.com/globe-newswire/ontario-unions-tell-ford-to-listen-up-as-ontario-legislature-resumes

Reply on Twitter 1556799979347378177 Retweet on Twitter 1556799979347378177 1 Like on Twitter 1556799979347378177 4 Twitter 1556799979347378177
Load More...

Footer

Stay connected – get our blog updates
Copyright © 2022 Injured Workers Online
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

The information in this website is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for legal advice. For legal advice, see Find legal help