• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Injured Workers Online

Injured Workers Online

Working Together for Justice

  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • About
  • Twitter
Working Together for Justice
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • History
    • Law Reform
    • Workers’ compensation bills
    • Chronic Pain Victory
    • Research and Education
    • Bancroft Institute
    • Meredith Conference: “No-Half Measures”
    • RAACWI
  • Issues
    • Appeals
    • Benefits
    • Experience Rating
    • Funding
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Return to Work
    • Stigma and surveillance
    • Universal Coverage
  • Community
    • Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups (ONIWG)
    • Workers’ Comp Is a Right campaign
    • Injured Worker Groups
    • IW Speakers School
    • Injured Workers’ Stories
    • Organizing and Action
    • Arts & social justice
  • Events
    • Calendar View
    • RSI Awareness Day
    • Day of Mourning
    • Justice Bike Ride
    • Injured Workers Day
    • December demo
    • Labour Day – a workers’ festival
  • Media
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • Fact Sheets
    • Headlines on workers’ compensation
    • Videos
  • Resources
    • Law and Policy Submissions
    • Reports, Articles & Papers
    • Practical guides & booklets
    • IWHP Bulletins
    • Library
    • Find Legal Help
    • Links
Home / Blog / Appeals / Response to the Appeal Tribunal’s New Pre-hearing Process Consultation

Response to the Appeal Tribunal’s New Pre-hearing Process Consultation

January 21, 2023

The Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (WSIAT) has provided a number of proposed changes regarding their pre-hearing processes in order to reduce delays. The Injured Workers Community Legal Clinic made a submission to the consultation, which can be reviewed here.

In short, the proposed changes are problematic because they will make the process more challenging to navigate for injured workers and/or their representatives. We urged WSIAT to consider changes that simplify the process and help the system to serve the interests of injured workers.

Proposed Changes to the Notice of Appeal (NOA) Form

The Injured Workers Community Legal Clinic has always opposed time limits in workers’ compensation claims. They create an additional layer of bureaucracy that delays decision making and can result in claims being denied without consideration of the merits. The proposed changes to the Notice of Appeal (NOA) form do not address time limits (an injured worker has to submit the NOA to the Tribunal within 6 months of the final decision at the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) ). In fact, the proposed NOA is more comprehensive than the current NOA form, and therefore, will take significantly more time to complete. This is another reason why the government should get rid of time limits.

The proposed option in the NOA form allowing parties to indicate their preference for hearing format makes sense. The hearing format selected by the injured worker should generally be confirmed by the Tribunal. It’s important to respect the injured worker’s decision regarding the hearing format because hearings at the WSIB are increasingly done in writing, despite injured workers’ request for oral hearings. Since the Tribunal is the final level of appeal for worker’s compensation claims, it is reasonable that the Tribunal respects the hearing format preference of the injured worker.

Recommendations: 1. The 6 month timeframe to submit the NOA should be eliminated; and 2. The hearing format requested by injured workers should generally be confirmed by the Tribunal.

Proposed Consent Form

The Tribunal has proposed the creation of a new Consent Form in order to release files to respondent parties. Completing the new Consent Form after receiving the case record will provide injured workers the opportunity to review the case materials before they are sent to any respondents. This will reduce sensitive information from being released to respondents.

We strongly disagree with the proposed four-week time limit to complete the consent form. Claims can range from hundreds to thousands of pages, preventing the injured worker and/or their legal representative from thoroughly reviewing the file. The four-week time limit is insufficient and will likely lead to fewer legal representatives accepting clients due to the time crunch.

We strongly disagree with the proposal that the Tribunal may close the appeal if the worker doesn’t return the consent form within 4 weeks. The possibility of closing the claim if the consent form is not submitted is excessive and unreasonable.

Recommendations: 1. There must be ongoing consent requirements, as new information regularly comes to file; 2. The four-week time limit to complete the consent form should be extended to 12 weeks; and 3. The proposal to close the appeal if the consent form is not completed in the prescribed amount of time should be eliminated.

Proposed Hearing Ready Form

Our concerns about the Hearing Ready form are similar to our concerns about the Consent Form. Four weeks is simply not enough time to complete this form and produce everything that is required. A tight timeframe will create unintended consequences: 1. Representatives will refuse to accept new clients because of limited time, causing more and more workers to self-represent or the workers will continue to search for a new legal representative, which often takes many months – this defeats the purpose of the proposal to reduce delays; 2. A significant number of representatives will have to write to the Tribunal requesting more time to complete the Hearing Ready form – this will cause a backlog of appeals with inactive status – again, defeating the purpose of the four-week proposal; and 3. If the WSIB rejects the request for inactive status, the result will be lower quality submissions made by injured workers or their representatives.

We strongly disagree with the proposal that the Tribunal will close the appeal because the Hearing Ready form was not submitted within the four week period. This penalty is unreasonable and excessive.

Recommendation: The proposed Hearing Ready form should be withdrawn. In its place, the Tribunal should develop a simple and straightforward form that is worker-friendly.

Disclosure

Currently, evidence must be disclosed to the Tribunal and to the other parties no later than three weeks before the hearing date. The Tribunal has proposed that evidence must be produced simultaneously with a Hearing Ready form, 4 weeks after receiving the Issues on Appeal letter.

This is very concerning. Reviewing and gathering information takes a significant amount of time. Moreover, there is no need to submit evidence, submissions, witness information/statements, and case law at the same time. This is not how things are done now and there is no need to modify what appears to be working. Furthermore, anything beyond that 4-week period would be considered late – and would have to be handled as a preliminary matter in the hearing. This 4-week time crunch does not make sense, as the hearing date would not yet be scheduled, meaning that the evidence would have to be produced months before a hearing date.

Recommendation: 1. Disclosure should continue to be tied to the hearing date. The three-week rule should be maintained.

Organized labour has requested that the Tribunal summarize the reports and that the consultations remain ongoing considering the nature of the proposed changes. Check back here for future updates.

Filed Under: Appeals

Primary Sidebar

Latest Tweets

Injuredworkersonline Follow

IWO_org
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
27 Jan

Let's talk worker mental health https://rabble.ca/labour/lets-talk-worker-mental-health/ via @rabbleca

Reply on Twitter 1618780529977081857 Retweet on Twitter 1618780529977081857 Like on Twitter 1618780529977081857 Twitter 1618780529977081857
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
25 Jan

Veteran miners struggle to get workers' comp for lung disease https://www.timminstoday.com/local-news/veteran-miners-struggle-to-get-workers-comp-for-lung-disease-6431991 via @TimminsToday

Reply on Twitter 1618362436461154305 Retweet on Twitter 1618362436461154305 Like on Twitter 1618362436461154305 Twitter 1618362436461154305
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
19 Jan

A Sudbury man is warning others that they may face difficulties securing financial compensation if they’re injured on the job after submitting their two-week notice. https://thesudburystar.com/news/i-was-tenacious-about-going-after-them

Reply on Twitter 1615896868747100161 Retweet on Twitter 1615896868747100161 Like on Twitter 1615896868747100161 Twitter 1615896868747100161
Load More...

Footer

Stay connected – get our blog updates
Copyright © 2023 Injured Workers Online
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

The information in this website is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for legal advice. For legal advice, see Find legal help