• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Injured Workers Online

Injured Workers Online

Working Together for Justice

  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • About
  • Twitter
Working Together for Justice
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • History
    • Law Reform
    • Workers’ compensation bills
    • Chronic Pain Victory
    • Research and Education
    • Bancroft Institute
    • Meredith Conference: “No-Half Measures”
    • RAACWI
  • Issues
    • Appeals
    • Benefits
    • Cost of living adjustments
    • Deeming
    • Pre-existing conditions
    • Experience Rating
    • Funding
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Return to Work
    • Stigma and surveillance
    • Universal Coverage
  • Community
    • Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups (ONIWG)
    • Workers’ Comp Is a Right campaign
    • Injured Worker Groups
    • IW Speakers School
    • Injured Workers’ Stories
    • Arts & social justice
  • Events
    • Calendar View
    • RSI Awareness Day
    • Day of Mourning
    • Injured Workers Day
    • Women of Inspiration Vigil
    • Labour Day – a workers’ festival
  • Media
    • Press Releases
    • Fact Sheets
    • Headlines on workers’ compensation
    • Videos
  • Resources
    • Law and Policy Submissions
    • Reports, Articles & Papers
    • Practical guides & booklets
    • IWHP Bulletins
    • Library
    • Find Legal Help
    • Links
Home / Blog / Appeals / Impact of harassment and chronic mental stress appeal decision unclear

Impact of harassment and chronic mental stress appeal decision unclear

November 20, 2014

The April 2014 WSIAT 2157/09 decision which allowed a claims appeal by a nurse who had faced 12 years of ongoing workplace harassment, still divides lawyers on its implications.  In this case the Tribunal concluded that claims for work-related mental stress which comes on over time can, like gradual physical injuries, be considered for compensation. The decision found entitlement limitations  – subsections 13(4) and 13(5) –  of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act to be unconstitutional under Charter equality rights.

In the Nov. 10 issue of Law Times, lawyer Jason Beeho points out this is not a legal precedent binding the Tribunal and each claimant for chronic stress will still face an uphill battle. The legislature has not yet proposed an amendment to clarify the Act or repeal the provisions.

Nor has the Board has  indicated it will change its Traumatic Mental Stress policy in line with the more flexible approaches taken by BC, Alberta and Saskatchewan

Filed Under: Appeals, Mental Health

Copyright © 2025 Injured Workers Online
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

The information in this website is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for legal advice. For legal advice, see Find legal help