• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Injured Workers Online

Injured Workers Online

Working Together for Justice

  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • About
  • Twitter
Working Together for Justice
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • History
    • Law Reform
    • Workers’ compensation bills
    • Chronic Pain Victory
    • Research and Education
    • Bancroft Institute
    • Meredith Conference: “No-Half Measures”
    • RAACWI
  • Issues
    • Appeals
    • Benefits
    • Experience Rating
    • Funding
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Return to Work
    • Stigma and surveillance
    • Universal Coverage
  • Community
    • Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups (ONIWG)
    • Workers’ Comp Is a Right campaign
    • Injured Worker Groups
    • IW Speakers School
    • Injured Workers’ Stories
    • Organizing and Action
    • Arts & social justice
  • Events
    • Calendar View
    • RSI Awareness Day
    • Day of Mourning
    • Justice Bike Ride
    • Injured Workers Day
    • December demo
    • Labour Day – a workers’ festival
  • Media
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • Fact Sheets
    • Headlines on workers’ compensation
    • Videos
  • Resources
    • Law and Policy Submissions
    • Reports, Articles & Papers
    • Practical guides & booklets
    • IWHP Bulletins
    • Library
    • Find Legal Help
    • Links
Home / Publications / IWC submission re WSIB Insurance Fund Surplus Distribution Model Consultation

IWC submission re WSIB Insurance Fund Surplus Distribution Model Consultation

August 10, 2021 by IWC Community Legal Clinic

Submission questions consultation objective of redistributing surplus funds to employers when it is injured workers and their benefits that were sacrificed to eliminate the unfunded liability in the first place and achieve the resulting surplus funding. While the Speer-Dykeman report refused to look at the history of the unfunded liability and who paid for it, IWC summarizes that history as the most important element of creating a path forward and provides recommendations on how the ‘surplus’ money could be used to provide fair restitution to injured workers …


10 August 2021

Ministry of Labour, Training and Skills Development Health, Safety and Insurance Policy Branch
Delivered by e-form.

Submission re: Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) Insurance Fund Surplus Distribution Model Consultation. Proposal # 21-MLTSD 017.

The enclosed submission contains feedback from the Injured Workers Community Legal Clinic (IWC) to the Ministry of Labour, Training and Skills Development.

Background

When we speak to injured workers and the labour community about the current consultation the MOL has launched regarding the surplus distribution model, “kicked when down,” is the main sentiment we hear. This is because the consultation is expressly aimed at determining how to reward employers – yet again – for the elimination of the WSIB’s unfunded liability and the resulting surplus funding.

We share their sense of shock and disappointment. How can this government even think of redistributing funds to employers when it is injured workers and their benefits that were sacrificed to eliminate the unfunded liability in the first place? Surely it is time to return to injured workers what was taken away from them in the name of eliminating the unfunded liability.

We reject the premise of the consultation, and we find it hard to disagree with injured workers when they tell us that the questions – which only relate to how to divide the spoils amongst employers – are insulting. From its very inception, this consultation itself is unfortunately flawed. This is because it grows from Speer-Dykeman report also called WSIB in Transition, 2020, which has a glaring defect in its analysis. Simply put, the report refused to look at the history of the unfunded liability and who paid for it. In fact, that report explicitly stated that it:

is not a backward looking document. Others have effectively covered the historical evolution of the WSIB. There is no reason to revisit the past here.

With this one simple sentence, the report released itself from the responsibility of looking at what created the unfunded liability in the first place (artificially low premiums) and who paid for its elimination (injured workers). By refusing to understand the past, WSIB’s Speer-Dykeman inspired modernization process – and subsequently this consultation process – fails to understand the present.

Briefly, we will summarize why history is not only an important part of understanding what the government and WSIB should do at this historic juncture, but that it is the most important element of creating a path forward….

Read full submission: available in pdf (download) and  Word (docx) format

Download IWC submission re WSIB Insurance Fund Surplus Distribution Model Consultation

Primary Sidebar

Latest Tweets

Injuredworkersonline Follow

IWO_org
Retweet on Twitter Injuredworkersonline Retweeted
Injured Workers A4J @iwa4justice ·
22 Mar

For International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, 21 migrant injured workers called the WSIB President today to tell their stories of how the WSIB has failed them.

Diana’s message is an example of the issues these injured workers shared with the WSIB.

Reply on Twitter 1638361838105645056 Retweet on Twitter 1638361838105645056 10 Like on Twitter 1638361838105645056 15 Twitter 1638361838105645056
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
23 Mar

The evolution of blame... Now we see incident investigations that show that the worker failed to refuse the unsafe work, which makes it their fault .... https://www.thesafetymag.com/ca/topics/leadership-and-culture/the-evolution-of-blame/440347#.ZByRKaRbi98.twitter

Reply on Twitter 1638961837520609280 Retweet on Twitter 1638961837520609280 1 Like on Twitter 1638961837520609280 3 Twitter 1638961837520609280
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
15 Mar

Then & Now: Technology and the changing hazards in mining https://www.thesafetymag.com/ca/topics/technology/then-now-technology-and-the-changing-hazards-in-mining/439237#.ZBH4wPPGS2M.twitter

Reply on Twitter 1636048781316882432 Retweet on Twitter 1636048781316882432 Like on Twitter 1636048781316882432 1 Twitter 1636048781316882432
Load More...

Footer

Stay connected – get our blog updates
Copyright © 2023 Injured Workers Online
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

The information in this website is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for legal advice. For legal advice, see Find legal help