• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Injured Workers Online

Injured Workers Online

Working Together for Justice

  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • About
  • Twitter
Working Together for Justice
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • History
    • Law Reform
    • Workers’ compensation bills
    • Chronic Pain Victory
    • Research and Education
    • Bancroft Institute
    • Meredith Conference: “No-Half Measures”
    • RAACWI
  • Issues
    • Appeals
    • Benefits
    • Experience Rating
    • Funding
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Return to Work
    • Stigma and surveillance
    • Universal Coverage
  • Community
    • Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups (ONIWG)
    • Workers’ Comp Is a Right campaign
    • Injured Worker Groups
    • IW Speakers School
    • Injured Workers’ Stories
    • Organizing and Action
    • Arts & social justice
  • Events
    • Calendar View
    • RSI Awareness Day
    • Day of Mourning
    • Justice Bike Ride
    • Injured Workers Day
    • December demo
    • Labour Day – a workers’ festival
  • Media
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • Fact Sheets
    • Headlines on workers’ compensation
    • Videos
  • Resources
    • Law and Policy Submissions
    • Reports, Articles & Papers
    • Practical guides & booklets
    • IWHP Bulletins
    • Library
    • Find Legal Help
    • Links
Home / Blog / Actions & Campaigns / Class action suit progressing

Class action suit progressing

April 11, 2017

In February 2017 Ontario’s Appeal Court (Castrillo v. Workplace Safety and Insurance Board, 2017 ONCA 121 (CanLII)) gave a green light to a class action lawsuit against the WSIB that applies the legal concept of misfeasance in public office. The court decision puts an end to the myth that the WSIB cannot be sued.

The class action was brought on behalf of workers who suffered permanent injuries from workplace accidents. Launched by lawyer Richard Fink in 2014 with representative plaintiff Pietro Castrillo, the lawsuit claims these injured workers were wrongfully denied the full benefits to which they were entitled under the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act because of a ‘secret policy’ in force (roughly 2011-2014). The suit alleges this secret policy illegally reduced non-economic loss (NEL) benefits for permanent impairments on the basis of asymptomatic prior conditions (such as degenerative disc disease related to aging) with the intent of saving the WSIB money. The secret policy applied a broader interpretation of the term “pre-existing impairment” to include asymptomatic conditions, which were excluded from the official policy on the books at the time. Injured workers who appealed the reduction had the full amount of the benefit restored based on the official policy, but many had to pay for legal representation to do this and they are suing to get their money back.

In the first of two recent posts in Administrative Justice System Reform, Ron Ellis discusses the lawsuit, the WSIB’s negation of the thin-skull doctrine and the implications of the Appeal Court decision. The second  explains the legal concept of the tort of misfeasance in public office is founded on the principle that those who hold public office and exercise public functions are subject to the law and must not abuse their powers to the detriment of the ordinary citizen. Ellis lays out evidence for charges the Board will have to address: that it exercised its statutory powers to determine benefit entitlements for an ‘improper purpose’ namely, cost-saving to an improper degree), and that the new NEL discounting policy was unauthorized.

Gary Hrytsak, local president of the Manitoulin-North Shore Injured Workers Group (MNSIWG) applauded the Court of Appeal’s “landmark ruling” allowing the class action to proceed:

“…the WSIB denies injured workers claims and benefits by indicating the employee had a pre-existing injury, even though these injuries and claims were made as employees who were injured in the workplace … By doing that they denied people the opportunity of there being fairness in the system”

The decision refused a procedural move by the WSIB to put an early end to the class action. There are many procedural steps to take and it will still be a long time before the action is certified and can proceed to trial.

Related reading:

  • van Rhijn, Judy. 2017 Apr. 3. “Focus: WSIB Class Action to Proceed to Certification.” Law Times
  • Ellis, Ron. 2017 Mar. 27. “WSIB and Some of the Evidence it will have to Confront in Castrillo.” Administrative Justice System Reform
  • Ellis, Ron. 2017 Mar. 10. “WSIB and the Ontario Court of Appeal Decision in the Castrillo Class Action.” Administrative Justice System Reform
  • Venetis, Tom. 2017 Feb. 16. “Ontario Court of Appeal Okays Class Action Against WSIB.” The Lawyer’s Daily
  • Mojtehedzadeh, Sara. 2017 Feb. 14. “Class Action Against WSIB Claiming Unfair Benefit Cuts Given Go-Ahead.” Toronto Star
  • Monsebraaten, Laurie. 2014 May 12. “Class-Action Lawsuit Aims to Help Ontario Injured Workers.” Toronto Star
  • Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups. 2014 Apr. 4.  An Open Letter to Premier Wynne re Stopping the WSIB Benefit Policies Scandal.  Kaministiquia, ONIWG

Filed Under: Actions & Campaigns, Benefits

Primary Sidebar

Latest Tweets

Injuredworkersonline Follow

IWO_org
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
6 Aug

As a result of workers' rights advocates more occupational illnesses are being recognized and compensated ... https://www.elliotlaketoday.com/coronavirus-covid-19-local-news/new-column-suggested-for-miners-memorial-5652626 via @ElliotLakeToday

Reply on Twitter 1555705962832576512 Retweet on Twitter 1555705962832576512 2 Like on Twitter 1555705962832576512 2 Twitter 1555705962832576512
Retweet on Twitter Injuredworkersonline Retweeted
ONIWG @oniwg ·
5 Aug

Join injured workers as we gather with the @OFLabour and all worker's to welcome MPPs back to the legislature and demand immediate action on some of today's most important issues. https://mailchi.mp/6578b461128c/june1stinjuredworkersdayspreadtheword-13506115

Reply on Twitter 1555575137168130048 Retweet on Twitter 1555575137168130048 14 Like on Twitter 1555575137168130048 25 Twitter 1555575137168130048
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
5 Aug

A stressful liability | Canadian HR Reporter https://www.hrreporter.com/opinion/employment-law/a-stressful-liability/368741

Reply on Twitter 1555704323421642752 Retweet on Twitter 1555704323421642752 Like on Twitter 1555704323421642752 Twitter 1555704323421642752
Load More...

Footer

Stay connected – get our blog updates
Copyright © 2022 Injured Workers Online
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

The information in this website is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for legal advice. For legal advice, see Find legal help