• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Injured Workers Online

Injured Workers Online

Working Together for Justice

  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • About
  • Twitter
Working Together for Justice
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • History
    • Law Reform
    • Workers’ compensation bills
    • Chronic Pain Victory
    • Research and Education
    • Bancroft Institute
    • Meredith Conference: “No-Half Measures”
    • RAACWI
  • Issues
    • Appeals
    • Benefits
    • Experience Rating
    • Funding
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Return to Work
    • Stigma and surveillance
    • Universal Coverage
  • Community
    • Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups (ONIWG)
    • Workers’ Comp Is a Right campaign
    • Injured Worker Groups
    • IW Speakers School
    • Injured Workers’ Stories
    • Organizing and Action
    • Arts & social justice
  • Events
    • Calendar View
    • RSI Awareness Day
    • Day of Mourning
    • Justice Bike Ride
    • Injured Workers Day
    • December demo
    • Labour Day – a workers’ festival
  • Media
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • Fact Sheets
    • Headlines on workers’ compensation
    • Videos
  • Resources
    • Law and Policy Submissions
    • Reports, Articles & Papers
    • Practical guides & booklets
    • IWHP Bulletins
    • Library
    • Find Legal Help
    • Links
Home / Blog / Claims / Chinese restaurant workers – vulnerable also to claims suppression

Chinese restaurant workers – vulnerable also to claims suppression

April 27, 2016

”Widespread’workplace abuse persists for Chinese restaurant workers” / Sara Mojtehedzadeh & Nicholas Keung (Toronto Star,  Apr. 25, 2016) and Editorial 

Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic report on Chinese restaurant workersA just-released report – Sweet & Sour: The Struggle of Chinese Restaurant-Workers by the Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic (now CSALC) condemns a failure to protect this group of workers, amongst Ontario’s most vulnerable, and presents recommendations to address. Based on interviews conducted with 184 Greater Toronto Area restaurant workers of Chinese descent, the study documents “widespread and persistent violations” of workers’ rights as guaranteed under Ontario’s Employment Standards Act and Occupational Health and Safety Act. (In calling on the Changing Workplaces Review, currently reviewing precarious employment relationships, to adopt their recommendations, MTCSALC notes they echo many made in a similar report 30 years ago.)

Amongst the many violations of the restaurant workers’ rights identified in the recent report: workers’ compensation claims suppression.

58% said injuries were not reported to the WSIB

“Workers also reported … use of intimidation and threats to prevent workers from filing a Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) claim, and use of delay tactics and false records to deny workers access to the full WSIB entitlement. “(p.5) . These workers’ actual experiences reveal what the 2013 Prism report for the WSIB (Workplace Injury Claim Suppression) found “appears to be a real problem” – one earlier identified as an issue of concern by the Harry Arthurs’ WSIB funding review report Funding Fairness .

Claims suppression and experience rating

Preventing or discouraging the filing of a claim for benefits following workplace injury is a consequence of the way the WSIB sets employer rates. While Experience Rating is supposed to encourage employers to make their workplaces safer and encourage return to work, in reality it is bad for workers because it gives employers a strong financial incentive to limit claims costs. In other parts of our social safety net, such as Employment Insurance, CPP and OHIP, employers pay a fixed rate and therefor have no reason to discourage their workers from exercising their right to access these programs. Unfortunately the proposed new Rate Framework will serve only to expand experience rating to even more workplaces.

Related reading:

  • Metro Toronto Chinese & Southeast Asian Legal Clinic. 2016 Apr. Sweet & sour [Executive summary – Chinese]
  • “Chinese restaurant workers underpaid and overworked, new report says” (CBC News Toronto,  Apr. 25, 2016)
  • Injured Workers’ Consultants. 2015 Nov. Submission re Bill 109, Employment and Labour Statute Amendment Act 2015 (addressing claims suppression)
  • Experience Rating Working Group. 2015 Oct. Submissions to the WSIB Rate Framework Reform Consultation
  • Injured Workers’ Consultants. 2015 Sep. Changing Workplaces Review submissions

Filed Under: Claims, Employment, Experience Rating, In the News

Primary Sidebar

Latest Tweets

Injuredworkersonline Follow

IWO_org
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
15 Mar

Then & Now: Technology and the changing hazards in mining https://www.thesafetymag.com/ca/topics/technology/then-now-technology-and-the-changing-hazards-in-mining/439237#.ZBH4wPPGS2M.twitter

Reply on Twitter 1636048781316882432 Retweet on Twitter 1636048781316882432 Like on Twitter 1636048781316882432 1 Twitter 1636048781316882432
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
15 Mar

Bill C-224 Cancer legislation reaches important milestone in Canadian Parliament https://www.iaff.org/news/cancer-legislation-reaches-important-milestone-in-canadian-parliament/

Reply on Twitter 1636048154285215745 Retweet on Twitter 1636048154285215745 Like on Twitter 1636048154285215745 1 Twitter 1636048154285215745
Injuredworkersonline @iwo_org ·
15 Mar

Ontario roofing company fined after man not wearing fall protection killed in fall while working on a school portable - OHS Canada MagazineOHS Canada Magazine https://www.ohscanada.com/ontario-roofing-company-fined-110k-after-man-killed-in-fall-while-working-on-a-school-portable/

Reply on Twitter 1636047273758199809 Retweet on Twitter 1636047273758199809 Like on Twitter 1636047273758199809 3 Twitter 1636047273758199809
Load More...

Footer

Stay connected – get our blog updates
Copyright © 2023 Injured Workers Online
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

The information in this website is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for legal advice. For legal advice, see Find legal help