• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Injured Workers Online

Injured Workers Online

Working Together for Justice

  • Blog
  • Sign Up
  • About
  • Twitter
Working Together for Justice
  • Workers’ Compensation
    • History
    • Law Reform
    • Workers’ compensation bills
    • Chronic Pain Victory
    • Research and Education
    • Bancroft Institute
    • Meredith Conference: “No-Half Measures”
    • RAACWI
  • Issues
    • Appeals
    • Benefits
    • Experience Rating
    • Funding
    • Mental Health
    • Poverty
    • Return to Work
    • Stigma and surveillance
    • Universal Coverage
  • Community
    • Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups (ONIWG)
    • Workers’ Comp Is a Right campaign
    • Injured Worker Groups
    • IW Speakers School
    • Injured Workers’ Stories
    • Organizing and Action
    • Arts & social justice
  • Events
    • Calendar View
    • RSI Awareness Day
    • Day of Mourning
    • Justice Bike Ride
    • Injured Workers Day
    • December demo
    • Labour Day – a workers’ festival
  • Media
    • In the News
    • Press Releases
    • Fact Sheets
    • Headlines on workers’ compensation
    • Videos
  • Resources
    • Law and Policy Submissions
    • Reports, Articles & Papers
    • Practical guides & booklets
    • IWHP Bulletins
    • Library
    • Find Legal Help
    • Links
Home / Issues / Experience Rating

Experience Rating

Experience rating (ER) is supposed to encourage employers to make their workplaces healthier and safer and encourage return to work (by basing employer premiums on claims and costs). In reality, there is little to no evidence that experience rating accomplishes these goals. On the contrary, experience rating is detrimental to workers and employers because it provides employers with strong financial incentives to minimize costs by suppressing claims.

Workers in precarious employment are particularly vulnerable, with experience rating encouraging the growth of Ontario’s temporary employment agency industry in which employers outsource the more dangerous jobs and worker’s injury and illness risks.

New framework ignores “moral crisis”

video of Marion Endicott's presentation to 2012 symposium on financial incentives


Professor Arthurs’ 2012 report on WSIB funding identified the experience rating system as a “moral crisis” that must not be ignored and called for radical change or termination of the related programmes. While a 2013 Prism report for the Board found claims suppression to be a real if unquantifiable problem, the 2014 commissioned Douglas Stanley report recommended embedding experience rating even more deeply into the system to achieve “insurance equity.” In 2015 and 2017 the WSIB held rate framework reform consultations.

Same game under any other name….

The WSIB ‘s new  Rate Framework (in effect Jan 1, 2020) has expanded experience rating, making it the key factor in rate setting.

Submissions from injured worker advocates on the 2017 draft policies highlighted that the Rate Framework  promotes premium rate equity (not a permitted purpose under the Act) and that the policies continue to ignore :

  • the incentive under experience rating to avoid premium increases by using temporary workers for more dangerous work
  • the incentive for claims suppression (and the many forms it can take)  by basing premium rates solely on claims costs rather than classification and actual health and safety practices
  • integrating measures to promote health and safety into the rate framework
More resources and links
  • Injured Workers Community Legal Clinic. 2022 Jun. 29. Submission to Temporary Employment Agency Rate Setting Consultation.
  • Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups. Research Action Committee. 2022 Jun. 2. Letter to WSIB: Claim Suppression, Non-reporting and Abandoned Claims.
  • Experience Rating Working Group. 2018 Jan. 18. Submission re Rate Framework Policy Consultation | 2015 Oct. Submissions to the WSIB Rate Framework Reform Consultation‘
  • IWO Backgrounder. 2015 Mar.  Experience Rating [pdf]  – [Word version]
  • Schwartz, Joel. 2014. Rewarding Offenders: Report on How Ontario’s Workplace Safety System Rewards Employers Despite Workplace Deaths and Injuries. Toronto: Ontario Federation of Labour.
 

Updated April 29, 2023

Primary Sidebar

Issues

  • Appeals
    • Appeals ‘modernization’ history
    • Why do oral hearings matter?
  • Benefits
    • Cost of living adjustments
    • Deeming
    • Pre-existing conditions
  • Experience Rating
    • Claims suppression & other harms
  • Funding
    • Cost-cutting or crisis?
    • Funding reviews
  • Mental Health
    • Mental injury support & research
  • Poverty
  • Return to Work
    • How many find employment?
  • Stigma and surveillance
    • Surveillance
  • Universal Coverage
Rewarding offenders

Recent Updates

  • Injured workers denounce premium rate reduction & death at Fiera Foods
    September 26, 2019
  • Employers advised to double down on injured workers with new WSIB Rate Framework
    February 10, 2019
  • “Monumental legislation” will help keep temp workers safe – but there’s a long way to go
    March 13, 2018

More Related Updates

Footer

Stay connected – get our blog updates
Copyright © 2023 Injured Workers Online
  • Accessibility
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy

The information in this website is for educational purposes only. It is not a substitute for legal advice. For legal advice, see Find legal help